Another perspective into the crown prince's life
BOOK REVIEW
BY WORKU BELACHEW (PUBLISHED ON THE ETHIOPIAN HERALD ON 24 MAY 2014)
Title of book: “The emergence and failure of Abeyto Eyasu” Author: Atnafseged Yilma
Language:
Amharic
Genre: Biography
Publisher: Artistic printing enterprise
Number of
chapters: 17 Publisher: Artistic printing enterprise
Price: ETB 85,
USD 25
Number of pages: 337
Illustrations: Over 97
Date of publication:
April 2014
The
period of Abeto Eyassu, legitimate heir of
the great Emperor Menelik II is always with full of controversy. Lij Eyasu Michael was born to his
father Ras Ali of Wollo (later King
Michael), and Woizero Shewaregga Menelik. Writers that
articulate their contents making Eyasu at issue— particularity stressing to
uncover the facts that aggravated and caused the deposition of Lej Eyasu— have been quite often subject to
criticism of lacking both depth and
objectivity on two accounts.
Authors ostensibly grouped in Dejach Teferi Mekonen's, who later would
reign as Emperor Haile-Selassie, bloc try to justify the deposition of the
crown prince, Eyassu, referring to various evidences. To the contrary, others that were/are believed to be in Eyasu's bloc for their part engages in tarnishing Dejach Teferi's image
tagging him with a plotting of a successful
coup, organizing unfounded
accusations against Eyasu, just
for a mare desire of power.
Atnafseged's book takes readers between the frontiers of Eyesu's pedigree , coming to power, disposition and in house detention to give a clear picture of string of events, that help readers arrive at sensible conclusions. He used his backlog of writing techniques that he acquired back in the days when he was reporter of Menen Megazine, City Desk Editor of Addis Zemen newspaper being second man after Bealu Girma, and Editor-in- chief of Yezareyitu Ethiopia, among others.
Author
Atnafseged Yilima in his biographical
work elucidated the muse that has stricken him
to write this book this way: In the history of Eyasu, the destructive
stands high shouldered when compared to the constructive...there were blind
resentment his power rivalries spread against him. He [Eyesu] had remained
unfortunate of such campaigns even now after
a century. Diametrically opposite to that, others who favours Eyasu, inflate his deeds leaving aside the
wrongs he did. According to Atnafseged, the political backdrop of various times
consumed the history of Eyasu for their own cause. The author, therefore, tried
to address the objective of filtering
the fiction from the reality so as to make the new generation understand what
he calls “the truth”.
To
hit the nail on the head and come up
with sound justification, Atnafseged included data of both primary and
secondary kind in his book “The emergence and failure of Abeto Eyasu”, a literal translation of the book's
title. Along the course of the narration
which he opted to be from third person point of view, letters, exchanged
between important political figures,
interviews with eye witnesses, among others, substantiated his
assertions. In addition, he refereed and quoted, at times summarized from published and unpublished works of other
authors to base his arguments on a firm ground.
In
the first part of the book, the writer promised not to deliberately instigate
another hostile chapter as a result of his work. Later in the content, he used various techniques to strike a balance
and to keep this promise intact. For instance, he has given and treated with
equal weight substances related to Eyasu recorded by several authors, despite
the facts stand in conflict with his principal
argument.
At
some pages as one goes through the book,
the short-phrased remarks — mostly about
mistakes which brought tremendous chaotic results— are enough to put readers
in ambivalence as to the writer's orientation. After revealing how the
notabilities deluded King Micheal for
instance he exclaimed with a phrase
“innocent Woloye!”. And in other places as well his opinion has been
manifest as he criticized “wrong doers” particularly when it comes to
compromising the national interest for personal gains.
Having
said that, this writer wishes to make a bird’s eye view of the content of the
book.
The
author preferred beginning with the various titles of Eyasu which were common
in the system of Showa notabilities.
Among the titles were Lej ,
Abeto, and his horse's name Abba Tena.
Particularly the latter, Aba Tena, looks like an optimistic one, it has
something to do with stability, wellness and the likes.
When
readers leaf through the pages after reading the introduction, they do not get the content of the book immediately, rather
additional introductory pages
titled, “I have more to say”
appears. In these pages, he boldly criticized as Amharic is lacking ownership.
He said that the grammar in various work of authors is being highly violated.
His hard-boiled pen did not refrain from criticizing Ethiopian Orthodox Church
too, which he complimented it for being the origin of Ge'ez and Amharic
alphabets as well as creator and owner of
literature. But he squarely criticized the church itself for breaching
the the grammatical rules of this language. In his final analysis on this part,
he suggested the style he employed in using the arguably redundant Amharic
characters.
It
looks like that this book has a lot to say for anyone that study or simply
wants to know factors that account for political marriage between rulers during
the imperial time. When Atnafseged assessed the
pedigree of Eyasu, he went as far
back both to his paternal and maternal bloodlines such as the parents of Atse (Equivalent to emperor) Menelik II,
families of Eyasus' mother and to his father's parents.
The
significance of writing and
reading/studding about Eyasu would not be out of the context of understanding
the cause and effect a very controversial “power transition” from Eyasu to
Empress Zewiditu and Ras Tereri Mekonen. It also encircles around weather the
prince's ousting is just or not.
After
the passing of Atse Menelik II, Lej Eyasu took over the crown under the
guardian of Ras Tesema Nadew. However,
Ras Tesema himself died after few years. Due to that, Eyasu had got the
autonomous power to follow his own free will, as documented by various authors.
Atnafseged,
therefore, sharply looked into this period and presented evidences on how
various high ranking officials of the time made historic mistakes both in misguiding Lij Eyasu and ignoring their responsibility to assign another guardian.
Atnafseged
is an equivocal to mention names of those whom he said were accountable for
making what he called historic mistakes in failing to guide the young leader.
Then, dominant politician
Fetawrari Hapte Giyorgis,
Patriarch Abune Matias, and Abune Wolde Georgis and even the prince's own
father Ras Micheal and Showan notabilities in general have not escaped this
criticism. Though these people could not defend themselves this time,
Atnafseged's directness is important for it
can open discussion between various groups.
As disproving the conversion of Eyasu to Islam, the major charge filed
against Eyasu by his rivalries, is in
the objective of Atnafseged's work, he has brought various evidences to
showcase the charge was a falsity created with assistance of European
colonials. For instance, he mentioned as Eyasu
built, Kechene Medhanealem church, a trend that Christian kings and
emperors practiced, he wrote as Eyasu jubilantly celebrated
Meskel in Addis Ababa, inter alia.
Though
Eyasu's measures had been bitter to Christian rulers, his far sighted
strategies of favouring marginalized
section of Ethiopian society and helping them
to stand in an equal feet among their fellow Ethiopians has been well
explained in the content of Atnafseged's
work, a matter that other writers failed to
mention. Eyasu's visit of
peripheries (emerging states ) of Ethiopia such as Afar and Ethiopian Somali, his political marriage to
their women has also been presented as the soundness of his strategy. Then
political system, however, was not patterned this way. Moreover, his being in
bad terms with then colonizing forces added fuel to it. And finally, with
fabricated photographs of Eyasu which showed as he wore in Islam traditions,
among other charges, brought an opportunity to hasten his demise, Atnafseged
wrote. Unlike similar biographers,
however, Atnafseged argued as the fabrication was just to dispose him from
power.
He
also pitied Eyasu, reasoning that the legacy Menelik had won was not easy to
bear for any successor, no matter who it
would be. Coupled with working without guardian, taking over and sustaining Menelik's legacy
was a duty that Eyasu alone was not able
to discharge.
Atnafseged
endeavored to explain turning points in
history of Ethiopia resulted from the political upheaval of the time. For
instance, the enthronement Menelik's daughter Empress Zewditu as well as Ras
Teferi as a heir instigated fierce battles among the people of Ethiopia that
lined up in opposite ends, history already recorded the battles of Tora Mesk, and Segele, just to mention few.
These and other battles vastly accounted for the death of many Ethiopians including Heroes/heroines of the battle of Adowa.
In
his analysis, the author remarked the price the people of Ethiopia paid as a
result of those wars. Atnafseged and other writers shared this fact with almost
the same tone. This internal instability was a great pretext creating a favourable
condition for the second Italian invasion.
If
the writer of this piece would like to recommend this book for readers, it is
first for those who study Ethiopian History and history of Ethiopian diplomacy
as well. For the general reader, this book contains a great deal in portraying,
among others, how internal instability creates swampy ground for external
antagonizing forces.
And
for young leaders of Ethiopia too, Atnafseged's work is crucial for it shows
how advancing individual needs at the expense
of common good brings a fatal end. Nation continues healthy and prosperous when
a generation relays something good to the next. This could be attained when
leaders are far sighted and stand united leaving differences aside.
No comments:
Post a Comment